The Landscape Architecture of Auroras on Demand

I’ve mentioned the following story to so many people, I thought I might as well put up a quick post about it. There are strong Kristian Birkeland vibes with this—and, of course, anything involving an entire mountain transformed into a kind of passive-cosmic megamachine is bound to get my attention.

[Image: Watercolor by Karl Lemström, taken from the paper “From laboratory to mountaintop: Creating an artificial aurora in the late nineteenth century” by Fiona Amery.]

Karl Lemström was a 19th-century Finnish physicist who believed that he had figured out how the Northern Lights—and planetary auroras, more generally—were produced.

Lemström was convinced the lights were an electromagnetic phenomenon, Graham Lawton writes for New Scientist, while others argued for things like “meteoric dust” combusting in the sky. Lemström, Lawton writes, “was determined to prove them wrong. Not with a tabletop simulation, but by creating an actual, full-sized aurora in one of its natural habitats, the frigid mountains of Lapland.”

[Image: Extraordinary watercolor by Karl Lemström, taken from the paper “From laboratory to mountaintop: Creating an artificial aurora in the late nineteenth century” by Fiona Amery; also seen via New Scientist]

In November 1871, Lemström installed a kind of super-antenna on a mountain known as Luosmavaara, in what is now Sweden (in fact, Luosmavaara is right above the mining city of Kiruna, which is now infamous for being moved, building by building, to avoid collapsing into the ever-expanding mine).

Lemström’s device “consisted of a 2-square-metre spiral of copper wire held aloft on steel poles about 2 metres tall. Soldered to the wire were a series of metal rods that pointed skywards. He ran another copper wire 4 kilometres down the mountain, to which he attached a galvanometer to measure the current and a metal plate to ground the device. This elaborate apparatus was designed to channel and amplify the electric current that Lemström fervently believed was flowing from the atmosphere into the earth, and hence bring forth an aurora.”

As with Kristian Birkeland, Lemström’s experiments only got more ambitious from there. He ended up on a different mountain, known as Orantunturi, where he unfurled what Lawton calls a “copper wreath” nearly 900 square meters in size.

[Image: Watercolor by Karl Lemström, taken from the paper “From laboratory to mountaintop: Creating an artificial aurora in the late nineteenth century” by Fiona Amery.]

Lawton’s full article is worth reading for more details and context, but I would strongly urge you to read historian Fiona Amery’s paper, “From laboratory to mountaintop: Creating an artificial aurora in the late nineteenth century,” from which Lawton pulled the majority of his material.

There, Amery refers to “a tradition of mimetic experimentation in the late nineteenth century, whereby morphologists sought to scale down sublime natural phenomena to tabletop devices in the laboratory.” The story of Lemström, she quickly adds, is about a “different kind of imitation,” or the production of a 1:1 simulation that would “materialize at the same scale as the original phenomenon.”

Of particular interest in Amery’s piece is the central question of whether or not Lemström did, in fact, successfully model—that is, trigger—an aurora, or whether the instrumentation he installed on these mountains was simply coincidentally present during otherwise unrelated auroral displays, or, indeed, whether Lemström saw an aurora at all, not a similar effect known as St. Elmo’s Fire.

My own imagination, for whatever it’s worth, remains totally captivated by the idea of mountain-scale atmospheric machinery, where vast copper wreaths, perhaps resembling the fine metalwork of royal jewelry, have been draped down a mountainside as a means for calling titanic curtains of electricity down from space.

What’s more, I can’t stop thinking about what might have happened if a passive experimental apparatus of this scale had been left, operational but abandoned, in the distant woods somewhere, forgotten entirely by local generations, such that rich auroral displays burning above the local mountains every season are only later discovered to be, in a sense, artificial. Then local teenagers—or an intrepid grad student, or, for that matter, a lost cross-country skier—come through, pulling aside dead branches only to discover an enormous machine covered in two century’s worth of vegetation, perhaps wondering if what they’ve found was built by humans at all.

(Of very tangential but potentially related interest: Shining Path; less related but still cool: A Voice Moving Over The Waters.)

Kristian Birkeland’s magnetic museum: or, ‘sunspots like no one else can do better’

Kristian Birkeland, the first scientist correctly to deduce the solar-magnetic origin of the Northern Lights, at one point was obsessed with building an experimental device here on Earth that could reproduce those polar-bound auroral effects.

Though he started off only vaguely over-ambitious, a combination of hyper-caffeination in the Egyptian desert and addiction to veronal produced BLDGBLOG-worthy architectural hubris I feel should be quoted here in full. So, bearing in mind that this is a true story, as told by Lucy Jago’s book The Northern Lights:

1) Birkeland’s vacuum chamber was a ‘machine in which to recreate many phenomena of the solar system beyond the Earth. He drew up plans for a new machine unlike anything that had been made before.

…[L]ike a spacious aquarium, [the box] would provide a window into space. The box would be pumped out to create a vacuum and he would use larger globes and a more powerful cathode to produce charged particles. With so much more room he would be able to see effects, obscured in the smaller tubes, that could take his Northern Lights theory one step further – into a complete cosmogony, a theory of the origins of the universe. (…) All sorts of beautiful solar phenomena could recreated this way, such as the sun’s corona, the shining layers of the sun’s outer atmosphere, usually visible only during a total eclipse. He could reproduce sunspots that moved across the surface of the terrella [the electrical globe-mechanism inside the vacuum chamber itself]… With this extraordinary machine Birkeland was able to simulate Saturn’s rings, comet tails, and the Zodiacal Light. He even experimented with space propulsion using cathode rays. Sophisticated photographs were taken of each simulation, to be included in the next volume of Birkeland’s great work, which would discern the electromagnetic nature of the universe and his theories about the formation of the solar system.

The ensuing period of nearly hypnotised overwork is referred to later as ‘Birkeland’s immersion into the universe of his vacuum chamber’.

2) But then he got ambitious. In a letter written from a hotel in Aboukir, Egypt, where Birkeland’s addiction to caffeine and veronal was driving him insane – along with the Saharan sun – he wrote: ‘And, finally, I am going to tell you about a great idea I have had; it’s a bit premature but I think it will be realised. I am going to get some money from the state and from friends, to build a museum for the discovery of the Earth’s magnetism, magnetic storms, the nature of sunspots, of planets – their nature and creation. On a little hill I will build a dome of granite, the walls will be a metre thick, the floor will be formed of the mountain itself and the top of the dome, fourteen metres in diametre, will be a gilded copper sphere. Can you guess what the dome will cover? When I’m boasting I say to my friends here “next to God, I have the greatest vacuum chamber in the world.” I will make a vacuum chamber of 1,000 cubic metres and, every Sunday, people will have the opportunity to see a ring of Saturn ten metres in diametre, sunspots like no one else can do better, Zodiacal Light as evocative as the natural one and, finally, auroras… four metres in diametre. The same sphere will serve as Saturn, the sun, and Earth, and will be driven round by a motor.’

So, aside from conjuring up images somewhere between Frankenstein, City of Lost Children and Batman, perhaps, Birkeland’s mountaintop cosmogonic laboratory brings up the interesting possibility of modeling – even reproducing – the universe through architecture. Or, at least, through a combination of architecture and machinery (which is what architecture always was in the first place).

In any case, clue the United States Department of Energy in on this and you’ll – wait: they’ve already done it. It’s called Yucca Mountain.

Perhaps a subterranean tour of the carved radioactive vaults of Yucca Mountain will be available to someone in a few ten-thousand years. By which time Birkeland’s almost H.P. Lovecraftian visions of simulating the birth of the universe atop a granite mountaintop, beneath a copper dome, will be long forgotten.

Oh, one more thing – in fact, two more things: 1) note that cathode rays, which Birkeland used in his vacuum chambers, are also what make non-digital television possible (raising the intellectually stimulating idea that television, in and of itself, as a technical object, is a model of the cosmos); and 2) note that Birkeland says ‘next to God, I have the greatest vacuum chamber’, implying of course that the universe already is a vacuum chamber, in which case one could argue – at least rhetorically – that we are living not in the universe as such but in what is already the experimental reproduction of the universe, a universe which lies elsewhere. The universe itself, then, the universe we run tests on and live within, is just a model, a prototype even. But that’s neither here nor there…