Artificial earthquakes triggered by deep-crust drilling operations have always been of interest here, and The New York Times brings the idea back into the media cycle today with a new article – complete with a sidebar titled “The Danger of Digging Deeper.”
Don’t miss the interactive graphic.
[Images: Geothermal projects and earthquake clusters in northern California; graphics by Hannah Fairfield, Xaquín G.V., James Glanz, and Erin Aigner for The New York Times].
So the scene this time is the countryside two hours north of San Francisco, with a company called AltaRock. “Residents of the region, which straddles Lake and Sonoma Counties,” we read, “have already been protesting swarms of smaller earthquakes set off by a less geologically invasive set of energy projects there. AltaRock officials said that they chose the spot in part because the history of mostly small quakes reassured them that the risks were limited.”
Serious seismic problems arise when you begin to tap into – and then break through – very deep rocks. The reference case for The New York Times here is something that happened in Basel, Switzerland, back in 2006 (a seismic event mentioned briefly in The BLDGBLOG Book). The specific drilling technique used in Basel, we read, was one that “created earthquakes because it requires injecting water at great pressure down drilled holes to fracture the deep bedrock.”
The opening of each fracture is, literally, a tiny earthquake in which subterranean stresses rip apart a weak vein, crack or fault in the rock. The high-pressure water can be thought of loosely as a lubricant that makes it easier for those forces to slide the earth along the weak points, creating a web or network of fractures.
A very similar technique, however, will soon be put into widespread use in northern California. There, in the foggy hills and forests, AltaRock “has received its permit from the federal Bureau of Land Management to drill its first hole on land leased to the Northern California Power Agency, but still awaits a second permit to fracture rock.”
One resident awesomely points out: “If they were creating tornadoes, they would be shut down immediately. But because it’s under the ground, where you can’t see it, and somewhat conjectural, they keep doing it.”
Artificial tornadoes! The U.S. wind industry should take note.
[Image: Artificial terrain rises from below… A screenshot from Fracture by LucasArts].
In many ways, I’m reminded of the game Fracture by LucasArts, in which “terrain deformation” is deployed as a central part of gameplay. You use weapons like Tectonic Grenades to generate new and temporary, but militarily significant, geographic features: hills, valleys, moraines.
Putting these two stories together, though, perhaps an interesting plot emerges…
You find yourself driving north out of San Francisco one fall, hoping to do some hiking – but the further north you go, the more you notice slight tremors. Every few minutes, there’s an earthquake – and some of them are rather large.
Soon, things start to look unfamiliar. You thought you knew this landscape from previous travels, but it no longer looks quite right. There are hills where you don’t remember hills being. The road itself, freshly paved and by all indication brand new, weaves and winds around lulls and rises that aren’t marked on the map – and the map was printed six months ago.
Finally, you reach your hotel around nightfall, only to experience another set of small earthquakes shake the ground. The clerk laughs as you try to sign for your room, because your signature comes out all wobbly as another temblor strikes. Your suitcase falls over.
“Am I gonna get any sleep tonight?” you ask, trying to play it funny.
But then, at 7am the next morning, your investigations begin…
Turns out, in a geologically-themed science fiction film directed by Roger Donaldson, from a screenplay by BLDGBLOG, that deep drilling operations by a foreign geothermal consortium have been “unlocking” certain well-faulted portions of subsurface bedrock; huge masses within the earth’s surface then rise or fall, slipping sometimes quite quickly, thus drastically altering the visible landscape… and causing thousands of earthquakes each year.
The surface of the earth is being rearranged from below.
In any case, check out the New York Times for more.
(Thanks to Nicola Twilley for the tip!)
9 thoughts on “The Danger of Digging Deeper”
Wow. So they're drilling into rocks, that might fracture, which support other rocks, which support thousands of buildings. Great, Tectonic Kerplunk.
I don't even know why I follow this blog, having no interest whatsoever in architechture (or so I thought), but I'm glad I do. This is frequently excellent.
As for unexpected terrain deformation, how about the case of Staufen in Germany (incidentally, just a few miles north of Basel, in the sensitive Rhein fault): Geothermal drilling caused a chemical reaction which made parts of the city rise several inches.
"frequently excellent" … Looks like BLDGBLOG has it's new tag line! ")
Had to laugh and comment about Jazmeister's and Silus' comments.
Jaz – The closest I've ever come to an actual interest in architecture was dating a masters student at Clemson. But this blog is fantastic even if I don't always understand.
Silus – I think we need Tshirts!!
Just a note as well… (doing my due diligence) The maps that top this post are made possible through Geospatial Information Systems (GIS); a much underrated profession that touches EVERYONE whether they know it or not. Don't think so? Ever used Mapquest, GoogleEarth, or read about a disease outbreak from CDC and saw a map detailing the outbreak? That's GIS!
I'm another one of the archictecture neophytes. I wasn't interested in architecture UNTIL I read this blog. Now, I can't stop. Even as I've purged the RSS feeds to a couple dozen (and all infrequently updated), BLDGBLOG remains essential.
My only comment on the post:
"The road itself, freshly paved and by all indication brand new, weaves and winds around lulls and rises that aren't marked on the map – and the map was printed six months ago."
Printed maps? What kind of future is this? 😉
This is no joke. My parents live less then ten miles from the project site and between the summer fires and the frequent earthquakes it's a wonder anyone wants to live there at all. Except, of course, that it's insanely gorgeous what with the vineyards and redwoods, etc.
Regarding artificial tornadoes…
I live and work in Mojave California now (you should come up, Geoff, see the spaceport) which is downwind of a huge wind farm.
Occasionally, while sitting in the shop we'll hear sand and small rocks being blown against the shop as it gets hit by a large dust devil.
Another large wind farm just went in north of here, and another is planned. If your house was downwind of the site of one, and after it was activated your flowers got ripped out every week by dust devils that never happened before, could you sue the owners?
I've seen a "vortex street" of dust devils rolling across LA county, north of Lancaster.
Frequently excellent…! Not a bad place to start, I hope? Thanks for the comments.
I didn't know about the village of Staufen – amazing story. And, Ben, the idea of capturing deliberately generated artificial Von Kármán vortices for the purposes of wind power is pretty awe-inspiring. Once I'm back in LA – I'm traveling right now – it'd be great to figure out a trip to Mojave.
Navigator – point taken: "Your map was only just updated by Google two weeks ago – yet, still, you come across more and more landforms that seem somehow brand new."
I only ever took a handful of geology courses, but shouldn't the "lubrication" of these faults be seen as a benefit? I mean the tectonic plates are moving underfoot whether they're drilled into or not.
Isn't it preferable to set off a multitude of tiny earthquakes instead of letting the pressure build up until a huge one tears through the countryside?